| Revised: November 12, 2009 |
| |
File &
Number |
Status |
| |
Walter Construction EAB 05-006 November 6, 2009 |
This appeal is with respect to the May 31, 2005 decision of Alberta Environment to
issue EPEA Environmental Protection Order No. EPO-2005/11-SR to Walter Construction Corporation
for the reclamation of a sand and gravel pit within SE 1/4 10-7-29-W4M near Pincher Creek.
The Hearing scheduled for November 30, 2005 in Lethbridge
was adjourned as the parties were in discussions to resolve the appeal. Walter Construction
and Alberta Environment subsequently reached an agreement and work was to be completed in 2006.
Alberta Environment advised that a detailed site assessment is to be completed in March 2008
and remedial work is to take place during the 2008 construction season.
Regular status reports were required from the parties. A meeting was held February 2, 2009 in
Lethbridge, with Board Counsel facilitating the meeting. Monthly status reports will be provided
by Alberta Environment; they will retain a thid party consultant to prepare a 3 level plan
to carry out the reclamation work; they will provide a copy of the plan to the landowner and
to the Board; and the Board will convene a follow-up meeting. The next monthly status report
is due December 7, 2009
|
|
Town of High River EAB 05-014-05-019, 05-021, 05-032-039 & 05-041 October 6, 2009 |
Eight Notices of Appeal were received with respect to the August 25, 2005 decision of Alberta Environment
to issue Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act Approval No. 00209177-00-00 to the Town
of High River authorizing the construction of the Golf Course Dyke, and Baker Creek Dyke on the floodplain
and/or floodway of the Highwood River. Nine Notices of Appeal were received in relation to the
Amending Approval issued to the Town of High River on October 12, 2005. Mediation Meetings were held on
November 25, 2005, June 20, 2006, and January 31, 2007, in High River, and the mediation is now closed. The Town of High River
will be making application to Alberta Environment for an approval for additional flood control works (tight
wrap dyke). The appeals will be held in abeyance until the new approval is processed. The Appellants are
free to ask the Board to proceed with
their appeals at any time and the Board will then decide how to proceed. Participants were given an opportunity
to comment on the Town's application before submitting it to Alberta Environment.
The Town of High River placed an advertisement in the local paper on May 27, 2009 for the Beachwood tight
wrap dyke and Alberta Environment placed the notice on their website, advising that Statements of Concern for the
application for the approval of the Beachwood tight wrap dyke are to be submitted to Alberta Environment
by June 3, 2009. The notices were for the Beachwood tight wrap dyke only and not the Vista Mirage project. On
September 11, 2009, Alberta Environment issued Water Act Approval 00254108-00-00 to the Town of High River
for the construction of flood control measures in the flood hazard area of Highwood River/Baker Creek. The
Board's September 15, 2009 letter advises that anyone who filed a Statement of Concern and
wishes to appeal the project (or wishes to participate in an appeal of the project should
one be held), must file a Notice of Appeal with the Board within 7 days of receiving notice of
Alberta Environment's decision to issue the Approval. The Board has strict timelines for
filing appeals and does not routinely extend these deadlines. On October 6, 2009, the Board
advised that it did not receive any appeals of the new Approval and requested the seven Appellants advise
by October 22, 2009 if they will be proceeding with their appeals or abandoning their appeals.
|
|
Patrick J. McCarthy
EAB 07-143 October 16, 2009 |
A Notice of Appeal was received on February 8, 2008 from Mr. Patrick J. McCarthy
with respect to the February 1, 2008 decision of Alberta Environment to refuse to issue
an Approval under the Water Act
to Mr. McCarthy for infilling a water body located at SW-5-47-20-W4M, near Camrose.
On March 13, 2008, in consultation with the participants, the Board held a
Mediation Meeting on June 2, 2008. The
Mediation Meeting was between identified participants only. Following the
Mediation Meeting, the Board requested the Appellant provide regular status reports.
The next status report is due January 5, 2010. If the next status report does not
indicate significant work has been undertaken to resolve the matter, the Board will set a
hearing date.
|
|
Westridge Utilities
EAB 07-146 September 1, 2009 |
On February 1, 2008, Alberta Environment wrote to Westridge Utilities
Inc. advising that its application filed in 2004 for a water licence was incomplete,
and because the Crown Reservation had taken effect, even if the application was
completed, it could not be processed and no priority number could be issued.
The application for the licence was for a diversion of water at NE 6-24-2-W5M.
The Board held a Preliminary Motions Hearing on August 26, 2008 to hear
submissions on whether the Board had jurisdiction to hear the appeal and
the request for document production by Westridge. On October 22, 2008, the
Board issued its Decision. The Board found that no decision had been made
by the Director, Alberta Environment regarding the application for the water licence because the application was
deemed incomplete by the technical staff of Alberta Environment. As
a designated Director under the Water Act did not make a decision
on the application, there was no decision that could be appealed to the Board.
All of the correspondence from Alberta Environment to Westridge from the time
the application was received until February 2008 reaffirmed that the application
was incomplete. Westridge did not provide the additional information requested
by Alberta Environment's technical staff to complete the application. The
Board dismissed the appeal because it did not have jurisdiction. Because the
appeal was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds, the Board did not consider
the document production motion.
On December 12, 2008, Westridge filed 2 Originating Notices in
the Court of Queen's Bench in Calgary (0801-15719 and 0801-15729) regarding
their water application filed with Alberta Environment and the Board's October 22, 2008
Decision. The respondents in both actions are the Minister of Environment, the Attorney
General, and the Regional Director, Southern Region, Alberta Environment.
On April 27, 2009 the designated Director made a decision
that Westridge's application was incomplete. A Consent Order was issued for Action
0801-15719 as the Director's decision fulfills the relief sought by Westridge. Action
0801-15729 remains outstanding. A new action was filed by Westridge on July 6, 2009,
Action 0901-09830, regarding the Director's April 27, 2009 decision. The matter is
to be scheduled.
|
|
Municipality of Crowsnest Pass
EAB 08-016 October 16, 2009 |
A Notice of Appeal was received on September 19, 2008
from the Municipality of Crowsnest Pass in relation
to the August 18, 2008 decision of Alberta Environment to
refuse the Municipality of Crowsnest Pass' application for a Water Act
licence in relation to the proposed Sentinel water well located at SW-16-08-05-W5M.
Alberta Environment refused to issue a licence because of the possible surface/ground
water connection between the Sentinel well and Crowsnest Lake. As a result
of the possible connection and the closure of the South Saskatchewan River
Basin, Alberta Environment refused to issue a licence.
The Board has scheduled a mediation meeting for January 14, 2009, in
Lethbridge. On January 8, 2009, the Municipality and Alberta Environment advised they
were in discussions and they were unable to compile additional technical
information in time for the January 14, 2009 mediation meeting, and therefore,
requested an adjournment of the mediation meeting for 6 months. On
January 9, 2009, the Board granted the abeyance and requested the parties
provide monthly status reports commencing January 30, 2009. The Board also
advised that in light of the length of time for
discussions, the Board did not see the usefulness of using further resources
for a mediation meeting.
The hearing scheduled for October 20, 2009, in Lethbridge, has been adjourned
and rescheduled to November 24 and 25, 2009. Alberta Environment requested
an adjournment that was agreed to by the Municipality and granted by the Board.
The hearing is open to the public for viewing only.
Any person other than the parties who wished to make a representation
before the Board on this appeal was to have contacted the Board by
September 11, 2009. The Board granted limited standing to Bridgegate Financial
Corporation, ClansWest Development Ltd., and Mr. Terry Kenney.
Copies of material filed with the Board respecting this appeal
are available for viewing at the Blairmore Public Library or at the Board
office by appointment.
|
|
Evergreen Regional Waste Management Services Commission
EAB 08-036 - 08-038 October 23, 2009 |
Three Notices of Appeal were received on February 2 and 4, 2009 with respect to
to the December 30, 2008 decision of the Director, Alberta Environment,
to issue to Evergreen Regional Waste Management Services Commission EPEA Approval
248406-00-00 for the construction, operation and reclamation of the Evergreen
Regional Landfill (Class II) near St. Paul, where more than 10,000 tonnes per year of waste
is disposed of. A stay of the Approval was also requested by the
Appellants, and on March 12, 2009 after reviewing submissions, the Board decided
that a stay would not be granted. Although preliminary motions
were received from Alberta Environment and the Commission, on March 13, 2009 the
Board advised the appeals would proceed to mediation.
The mediation meeting held April 23, 2009 was unsuccessful.
The Board set a schedule to receive submissions on the preliminary motions raised
by the Commission and Alberta Environment, along with a further
stay request of the appellants. The motions raised are: Did the appellants
file Statements of Concern with Alberta Environment (in this case a prerequisite to
filing a Notice of Appeal); Are the appellants directly affected by the Approval; What
are the issues in the Notices of Appeal that are within the Board's jurisdiction;
and what are the issues that should be heard at a hearing, if one is held. On
October 23, 2009, the Board
determined that only the appeal of Dr. Amil Shapka would proceed, the appeals of the
Tomlinsons have been dismissed for either not filing a proper Statement of Concern
with Alberta Environment or for not being directly affected by the Approval under appeal.
The Board also determined the issues to be heard at the hearing: 1. Does the Approval
adequately address the potential impacts of the expanded landfill on the groundwater
and the local wells? and 2. Did the Director, Alberta Environment, adequately consider
the potential impacts of the expanded landfill on surface water run-off and surrounding watersheds?
The Board's full reasons will be forthcoming.
A hearing has been scheduled for January 18 and 19, 2010, in St. Paul.
Any person, other than the parties, who wishes to make a representation before the Board
on this appeal must submit a request in writing by fax or by e-mail to the Board. The
request must be received by the Board on or before November 24, 2009. It is your
responsibility to ensure that your request is received by the Board by November 24, 2009.
Such a request shall (a) contain the name, address, telephone, and fax numbers of the
person submitting the request, (b) indicate whether the person submitting the request
intends to be represented by a lawyer or agent and, if so, the name of the lawyer or agent,
(c) contain a summary of the nature of the person's interest in this appeal, and
(d) be signed by the person submitting the request. After November 24, 2009, the Board will,
in its discretion, determine if other persons may make representations, and the manner in
which they can be made. Once all parties have been determined, the hearing will be
open to the public for viewing only.
The information requested is necessary to allow the Environmental Appeals Board
to perform its function. The information is collected under the authority of the
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, section 33(c). Section 33(c)
provides that personal information may only be collected if that information
relates directly to and is necessary for the processing of this appeal. The
information you provide will be considered a public record.
Copies of material filed with the Board respecting this appeal are available
for viewing at the St. Paul Municipal Library, 4802-53 Street, St. Paul, Alberta,
during its normal operating hours, or by appointment at the Board's office
in Edmonton.
|
|
ARC Resources
EAB 08-039 November 3, 2009 |
A Notice of Appeal was received on February 10, 2009 from the landowner
with respect to Alberta Environment's March 18, 2008 decision to issue EPEA Reclamation
Certificate No. 00245872-00-00 to ARC Resources
for the Esso Unit Pembina 2-28-49-6 well, located near Drayton Valley.
In consultation with the participants,the Board held
mediation meetings and a site visit on June 9, 2009 and September 28, 2009.
As a result of the mediation meeting a resolution was reached that resulted
in the appeal being withdrawn on November 2, 2009. The Board will be issuing
a Discontinuance of Proceedings and closing its file in this matter.
|
|
Husky Oil Operations Limited
EAB 08-040 October 30, 2009 |
A Notice of Appeal was received on February 10, 2009 from the landowner
with respect to Alberta Environment's May 23, 2008 decision to issue EPEA Reclamation
Certificate No. 247302-00-00 to Husky Oil Operations Limited
for the Renaissance 11C Berry 11-22-27-12 well, located near Sunnynook.
On May 22, 2009 the Board held a mediation meeting and site visit. The
mediation is ongoing and the next status reports are due April 6, 2010.
The Mediation Meeting is between identified participants only.
|
|
Chemtura Canada Co./CIE
EAB 09-001 October 2, 2009 |
A Notice of Appeal was received on May 22, 2009 from Alberta Diluent
Terminal Ltd. with respect to Alberta Environment's April 22, 2009
decision to issue EPEA Approval No. 11510-02-00 to Chemtura Canada Co./CIE
for the chemical manufacturing plant in northeastern edge of the City
of Edmonton. Alberta Environment and Chemtura requested the appeal be
dismissed for failing to file a Statement of Concern with Alberta
Environment. On June 30, 2009 the appeal was placed in abeyance
while Chemtura and the Appellant are in discussions. The next status reports
are due December 1, 2009.
|
|
Resort Development Funding Corp. (Gleniffer Lake Resort)
EAB 09-002 & 09-003 September 9, 2009 |
Notices of Appeal were received on June 11, 2009 with respect to
Alberta Environment's May 1, 2009
decision to issue EPEA Approval No. 19060-01-00 to Resort Development Funding
Corporation for the construction, operation and reclamation of a waterworks
system for the Gleniffer Lake Resort, near Spruce View.
Resort Development Funding Corp. has requested the appeals be
dismissed as the appellants are not directly affected by the Approval and
the issues raised are beyond the ability of the Board to deal with.
Final submissions were received on September 9, 2009, and the Board will
now make a decision on the validity of the appeals.
|
|
Rocky Mountain Propery Inc.
EAB 09-004 November 3, 2009 |
A Notice of Appeal was received on June 16, 2009 from Rocky Mountain
Property Inc. with respect to Alberta Environment's June 9, 2009
decision to issue Water Act Enforcement Order No. WA-EO-2009/04-SR
to Rocky Mountain Property Inc.
for removing 2 wetlands in the Wagon Wheel Industrial Park near Balzac.
As of July 8, 2009, the appeal is in abeyance while the appellant
and Alberta Environment are in discussions. The next status reports
are due December 7, 2009.
|
|
Chiles Development Corporation Ltd., Chiles Homes Ltd., Norman Chiles
EAB 09-005 November 12, 2009 |
A Notice of Appeal was received on June 18, 2009 from Chiles
Development Corporation Ltd., Chiles Homes Ltd., and Norman Chiles,
with respect to Alberta Environment's June 12, 2009
decision to issue Water Act Enforcement Order No. WA-EO-2009/01-CR
to Norman Chiles, Chiles Homes Ltd. and Chiles Development Corporation Ltd.,
for withdrawing water without a licence from S 1/2 03-39-27-W4M, in Red Deer. Alberta Environment
requested the Board dismiss the appeal as this particular Enforcement Order is not
appealable pursuant to section 115(1)(p) of the Water Act. The motion has been placed on hold
while Alberta Environment and Chiles attempt to resolve the appeal. Two amendments have been
issued to the Order and the next status reports are due November 16, 2009.
|
|
EcoAg Inititatives
EAB 09-006-009, 016, 017 & 019 November 3, 2009 |
Seven Notices of Appeal were received
with respect to Alberta Environment's June 23, 2009
decision to issue EPEA Approval No. 241939-00-00
to EcoAg Initiatives Inc. for the High River Waste Management
Facility for the collection and processing of waste to produce fuel.
On August 20, 2009 Alberta Environment provided their records and
advised that some of the appellants did not file Statements of Concern and
that some of the issues raised by the appellants are beyond the Board's
jurisdiction. The Board has placed the motions of Alberta Environment on hold
pending the outcome of a mediation meeting. A mediation meeting was held on October 30, 2009,
and is ongoing. The mediation meeting is between identified participants only.
|
|
Resort Development Funding Corp. (Gleniffer Lake Resort)
EAB 09-011 & 09-012 October 28, 2009 |
Notices of Appeal were received on August 5, 2009 with respect to
Alberta Environment's June 30, 2009 decision to issue EPEA Approval No. 19061-01-00
to Resort Development Funding
Corporation for the construction, operation and reclamation of a wastewater
system for the Gleniffer Lake Resort, near Spruce View. The mediation meeting
scheduled for November 4, 2009 has been rescheduled to January 13, 2010.
The mediation meeting is between identified participants only.
|
|
Fish Creek Ranch
EAB 09-013-015 November 5, 2009 |
Notices of Appeal were received on August 20 and 21, 2009 from Fish Creek Ranch
located near Bragg Creek, the Municipal District of Foothills No. 31, and an
individual, with respect to
Alberta Environment's July 7, 2009 decision to refuse to amend Water Act Preliminary
Certificate No. 00193231-00-00 held by Fish Creek Ranch by adding the
MD of Foothills No. 31 on the Certificate. Alberta Environment advised in their
decision that the Preliminary Certificate is a promise of water required for
22 lots on a subdivision and because the proposed communal water system
is on different lands as well as being a new project, the application for
amendment was refused. A mediation meeting
was held on November 3, 2009 that resulted in a resolution and
the withdrawal of the appeals. The Board will issue a Discontinuance of Proceedings
and close its file in this matter.
|
|
ConocoPhillips Canada
EAB 09-018 November 10, 2009 |
A Notice of Appeal was received on September 22, 2009 from the landowner
of SE 17-015-19-W4M with respect to Alberta Environment's July 16, 2009
decision to issue EPEA
Reclamation Certifiate No. 00252804-00-00 to ConocoPhillips Canada
for the Crestar 100 Little Bow 16-8-15-19 well, drilled from a surface
point in LSD 1 of 17-015-019-W4M, near Lomond, Alberta.
The Board scheduled a mediation meeting for December 15, 2009, however it
was cancelled on November 10, 2009 as the landowner came to an agreement
with ConocoPhillips and withdrew his appeal. The Board will issue a Discontinuance
of Proceedings and close its file.
|
|
Nexen Inc.
EAB 09-020 & 021 October 1, 2009 |
Notices of Appeal was received from the Fort McMurray First Nation and
the Mikisew Cree First Nation with respect to Alberta Environment's
August 21, 2009 decision to issue EPEA Approval No. 236394-00-00 to
Nexen Inc. for the construction, operation and reclamation of the Long
Lake South enhanced recovery in-situ oilsands or heavy oil processing
plant and oil production site. The site is located near the Hamlet of
Anzac, 40 km south of Fort McMurray.
A schedule will be set to receive submissions from the participants
on the following three motions:
1. What issues in the Notices of Appeal relate to constitutional issues that are
not within this Board's jurisdiction? What are the issues in the Notices of
Appeal that are not constitutional issues? In accordance with section 11
of the Administrative Procedures and Jurisdiction Act, this Board is not
designated under this legislation to hear constitutional matters.
2. The Board must consider whether the issues in the Notices of Appeal
have been considered by the Energy Resources Conservation Board.
The Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act provides that
this Board shall dismiss a Notice of Appeal
if in the Board's opinion
the person submitting the notice of appeal received notice of or participated
in or had the opportunity to participate in one or more hearings
or reviews under any Act administered by the Energy Resources Conservation
Board at which all of the matters included in the Notices of Appeal
were adequately dealt with.
3. How are the Fort McMurray First Nation and Mikisew Cree First Nation
directly affected by the Approval issued to Nexen Inc.?
|
|
Town of Ponoka
EAB 09-022, 023 & 024 November 5, 2009 |
Three Notices of Appeal were received on October 26 and 29 and November 5, 2009,
with respect to Alberta Environment's September 28, 2009 decision to issue
Water Act Approval No. 00250071-00-00 to the Town of Ponoka for the construction, operation,
and maintenance of a storm water management system. The Board will decide how the
appeals will be processed upon receipt of the records from Alberta Environment.
|
| |
For details regarding the appeals, please go to the Board's Hearing Schedule
|